Attribution and definitions
Each quantitative statement identifies its source and the date to which it is current. A capacity figure, a market estimate or a transaction multiple also needs a definition of what it measures. Differences in definition are retained when sources are compared.
Original analysis
Models and calculations state their assumptions. A scenario is distinguished from a forecast, and a derived value is identified as an inashanu estimate. The method should be sufficient for a reader to examine how the result was obtained.
Methods appropriate to the question
A financial model can test the economics of a defined asset. Geospatial analysis can examine location and access. Statistical analysis can characterise observed relationships, provided the sample and identification design support the conclusion.
Boundaries and uncertainty
Unanswered questions are recorded with their effect on the findings. Where public evidence is insufficient, the limitation stays in the analysis. A brief may be declined when the available evidence cannot support the requested conclusion.
Files that support scrutiny
Each published study includes a PDF report. The Firmus analysis publishes its valuation workbook; the data centre study adds an interactive explorer and licenses its workbook and register to firms on request. Each report includes its source log and data-gap register. Client deliverables are specified in the written scope schedule; the published studies demonstrate the form of work, with no client information.
General information
The work comprises research and scenario analysis. It does not constitute financial product advice, legal advice or a recommendation to enter into a transaction. Company analysis does not imply affiliation with or endorsement by the subject company.
Read the terms of engagement